French intervention in Mali: Avoiding the
entanglement trap lies beyond French control.
Algeria possesses the strongest
military in the region with experience fighting armed islamist groups within
its borders. It has always expressed reservation with respect to a military
intervention in Mali. However, its advocacy for political dialogue with the
main Islamist group Ansar-Eddine is likely to be reversed following an attack
deep within its territory in retaliation
for opening its airspace. The attack resulted in numerous hostages constitutes
a first for the country. Such installations never suffered even during the
troubled 1990s. The distance of the base relative to the Malian border (near In
Amenas) is closer to Libya, again reinforcing the relative insignificance of political
borders in the region, their porous nature and the potential vastness of the
theater of operations.
France has entered the
Malian conflict this week following a surprise rebel offensive on the south of
the country. The fall of strategic towns in rebel hands and the Malian
Military’s inability to contain the assaults prompted the French to mobilize
troops and aircraft to stem the rebel advancement towards the capital Bamako. France
bombarded rear rebel positions in their stronghold of Gao
& Kidal and deployed ground forces around the capital Bamako and the
Mopti Province.
The situation bares the
hallmarks of a modern conflict: a transnational network of Non-state armed groups
fighting a weak governments in an area that stretches across an entire Sahel region with porous borders that are
essentially imaginary lines in the sand: a remnant of France’s colonial
past.
Commenting on how long his
country will take the lead in the campaign “It’s a matter of weeks”
declared French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius. The government insists that
its current presence on the frontline of the conflict is a temporary measure
that aims to contain the rebel advance until African troops from ECOWAS are deployed.
However, such promises will be hard to keep as factors deciding how the
conflict plays out lay beyond the French army’s control. A closer look at the actors, the dynamics of the
conflicts, suggest that the French army could easily be lured into deeper
involvement if clear and limited objectives that fall within the UN
intervention mandate are not maintained.
Due to the logistics and
coordination necessary, the original intervention plan did not foresee a
deployment of 3,300 regional forces (a number deemed too
low by some military quarter) until September
2013. The preemptive assault by Islamist was an attempt to capitalize on
this since the capture of significant territory would provide considerable
strategic leverage on both the ground and
at the negotiating table. As stated previously, this is what precipitated French
involvement, refuting earlier assurances by the French President Francois
Holland that there would be “no
French boots on the ground”. Moreover, French authorities acknowledged that the militants have
turned out to be better-armed and equipped than initially thought after a French
combat helicopter
was downed by the rebels. Current plans anticipate a deployment
an additional 2,500 troop.
French Defense minister Le
Drian described his country’s action in broader terms such as the eradication
of terrorism in the region and has recently acknowledged the likelihood of a lengthy
campaign. According to retired
French General Vincent Desportes, France is currently pursuing three
objectives: the securitization of French nationals and the capital, holding the
frontline around Konna (700kms from Bamako), and training troops from Niger, Burkina,
Bénin, Togo and Sénégal to recapture the north of Mali.
In the short term, France
has for the most part fulfilled the first two; however, the ‘Africanization’
of the intervention through full deployment, coordination and training of Malian
and ECOWAS forces in short period of time is a significant endeavor with
numerous hurdles. At this point in time the Malian military remains weak, with
the French military like to bear the brunt of the work. Furthermore, the deployment
of ECOWAS troops likely to arrive this week is also expected to encounter complications
due to the premature timing vis-à-vis the initial plans. The conflict has
already spilled over into neighboring countries, including the regional power
Algeria that suffered an attack
on a gas installation on 16 January 2013.
France should not expect
much from Algeria. Despite having the strongest capabilities in the region these
remain relative to inherently weak states in the Sahel such as Mali. Though direct
involvement beyond its borders would provide a boost in capabilities, these remain
untested beyond Algeria’s borders, and are likely to be dedicated to
reinforcing the securitization of its own borders.
The dangers
of France finding itself entangled in a long conflict that stretches across the
Sahel are real, and lie beyond its control. Worst
case scenarios for France would be the being sucked into its own Afghanistan,
or a debacle similar to the US involvement in Somalia. The effect and quality
of deploying of ECOWAS troops is a determining factor but remains to be seen. France
is better off sticking to limited objectives in the short term or faces the
prospects of its own Afghanistan.
Houssem Tefiani.
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/01/a-map-of-the-bewildering-mali-conflict/267257/ probably the most comprehensive map on the conflict.. so far
ReplyDelete